Decimals to improper fractions program?

08132018, 01:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 08142018 01:36 AM by Gamo.)
Post: #21




RE: Decimals to improper fractions program?
Found this on HP Newsletter issue #25
Decimal to Fraction for the HP35S by Joseph K. Horn On Page 35 http://h20331.www2.hp.com/hpsub/download...r_2011.pdf Gamo 

08132018, 10:09 PM
Post: #22




RE: Decimals to improper fractions program?
(08132018 03:03 AM)Albert Chan Wrote:(06092018 02:54 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote: In engineering practice more important the relative error. In this case the results are: I think the idea of the table is to give a fraction that – at least – matches a certain accuracy level. So if you need an accuracy of 0,001% or better, 355/113 is the first fraction to meet that target. (08132018 03:03 AM)Albert Chan Wrote: I agree that relative error is more useful than digits matched. That's exactly why I prefer stating the number of matching digits. But I am not an engineer. ;) Dieter 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)