Summation based benchmark for calculators

01222019, 12:15 PM
Post: #161




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
max=1000
TI83plus (ver.1.16) time=105s TI85 (ver.9.0) time=131s internal result=1395.346287744 Code:


01262019, 09:53 PM
Post: #162




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
I cannot access the wiki4hp (I know it is up, just the routing somehow is messed up) to update the main version that the gets copied in the first post.
Wikis are great, Contribute :) 

01282019, 12:05 PM
Post: #163




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
Updated to post #161
Wikis are great, Contribute :) 

02152019, 11:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 02152019 03:49 PM by ijabbott.)
Post: #164




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
CASIO FX502P  Keystroke program (DSZ loop)
MAX 10: ~18.1s Result: 13.71183501{70} (Interesting that it doesn't use the guard digits to round up the 10th digit of the display.) MAX 100: ~182s Result: 139.2971870{48} (It's about half the speed of the FX602P.) Code: 001 C600 Min 0 ; store max N — Ian Abbott 

02182019, 11:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 02192019 05:58 PM by Jonathan Busby.)
Post: #165




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
Here is my summation code, mostly written in Saturn assembly for the HP48G/GX ( ROM version R ) :
Code: :: The results are as follows : *Display and keyboard scanning turned on*
and *Display and keyboard scanning turned off* ( Same long real numeric results as above )
I hope this helps. Jonathan EDIT : I have attached the HP48G/GXR binary and the source as well. Aeternitas modo est. Longa non est, paene nil. 

02192019, 07:30 PM
Post: #166




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
updated until post #165
Wikis are great, Contribute :) 

02192019, 08:20 PM
Post: #167




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
(12222017 09:41 PM)pier4r Wrote: max = 100 The reported result is incorrect for that one, it should be 139.2971870. (N.B. These fx991 listings are for the fx991EX (classwiz), not for the older fx991ms, fx991es, and fx991es plus.) — Ian Abbott 

02202019, 05:28 PM
Post: #168




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
Nice catch. I always hope find some small problems. I'll fix it soon.
Wikis are great, Contribute :) 

02212019, 08:07 AM
Post: #169




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
(02192019 08:20 PM)ijabbott Wrote:(12222017 09:41 PM)pier4r Wrote: max = 100 Also, for completeness, the "fast batch" fx991EX timing for max=100 is ~11s. — Ian Abbott 

02212019, 02:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 02212019 02:38 PM by grsbanks.)
Post: #170




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
1000 iterations on a SwissMicros DM10L @ 48MHz:
120s  result = 1,395.346288 

02212019, 02:46 PM
Post: #171




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
(02212019 02:38 PM)grsbanks Wrote: 1000 iterations on a SwissMicros DM10L @ 48MHz: Show off... Bob Prosperi 

02212019, 02:57 PM
Post: #172




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators  
05262019, 07:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 05262019 07:35 PM by Marc van Lemmen.)
Post: #173




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
Hi,
I am not sure if BIG old calculators are allowed, but I recently bought a HP9821A and I was curious how the HP9821A would perform against the modern calculators. Here are the results : 10 : ~4s result 13.71183502 100 : ~38s result 139.2971870 1000: ~390s result 1395.346288 I'll try my HP9100B later. Regards, Marc. 

05262019, 08:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 05262019 08:40 PM by pier4r.)
Post: #174




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
Everything is allowed that is handheld or it is specifically a calculator rather than a app on a general purpose system.
Or it is an app on a very restricted system mobile without quintillions of apps (like smartphones that were designed to not be tweaked by the users, like nokias, palm, and so on). Although the second category is valid only as loose reference. So yes the 98x0 and 9100 series are welcomed! I am still impressed by the articles in the hp journal where in practice they say "you can do anything with them" and indeed I guess some did. edit. wiki 4hp is unreachable for me (but it is up for other sites) so I will try another time. I need to catch up with the last posts. Wikis are great, Contribute :) 

05282019, 11:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 05282019 11:07 PM by pier4r.)
Post: #175




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
updated to post #173 now that I can see http://www.wiki4hp.com (damn routing in my zone!)
Impressive how the 9821A compares with modern day solar powered scientific calculators or the wp 34s . Neat! How much ram/user storage has it again? I remember the 9100 was around 400 steps (estended to 3000+ with an extension) Wikis are great, Contribute :) 

05292019, 03:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 05292019 05:44 PM by Marc van Lemmen.)
Post: #176




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
My HP9821A has a total of 423 registers ( Option 001 installed, a HP9820 with option 001 has 435 registers according to the manual !). One register is 4 words ( manual ), so that is 3384 bytes. There is also some internal memory, at least 256 words, so the total should be around 4Kb.
I think a HP9820/9821 without option 001 installed has about 2Kb of ram. By the way, the HP9821A is not RPN but algebraic. Programming method is pre HPL. My HP9100B is not working fine, he works intermittend. And there is no power or cuberoot function, I am working on it but it will take some time. I have a workaround, but less steps, so that would be difficult to compare. 

05312019, 11:19 PM
Post: #177




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
I've got it running on my HP9100B, but with another formula since there is no power function. Math is not my strong point, but i've used exp(ln(exp(sin(atan)))/3) which is al fraction faster than the original formula.
On my HP9821A it gave the following results : 10 ~4 sec. / 100 ~37 sec. / 1000 ~375 sec. Result for the HP9100B : 10 ~6.5 sec. result 13.71183502 100 ~66 sec. result 139.2971870 Since my Hp9100B stops working after a few minutes I was not able to run it with 1000. 

07092019, 02:02 AM
Post: #178




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
I tried the simplest summation, sum of x from x=1 through x=500,000 on my TI 36X Pro, the European edition of the 36X Pro (TI30X Pro MathPrint), my version A Prime from 5 or 6 years ago?, and the Prime G2 that I got Sunday at BB in Laredo!
36X: ~1 hour 45 minutes 30X: 18 minutes 45 seconds Prime A: ~8 seconds Prime G2: ~3.5 seconds (of course, in CAS, the answer appears instantly) 

07092019, 07:39 AM
Post: #179




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
(07092019 02:02 AM)lrdheat Wrote: the European edition of the 36X Pro (TI30X Pro MathPrint) Just to be clear, there are two TI30X Pro models: the older "MultiView" model (which is the same as the TI36X Pro), and the newer "MathPrint" model (no American version yet). — Ian Abbott 

07092019, 12:44 PM
Post: #180




RE: Summation based benchmark for calculators
Casio fx991EX
n=1000 t~ 2 min 15 sec Result=1395.3463 Gamo 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)