In support of the 33s & 35s

[TheKaneB]

Nevermind, my code had a few bugs in it, so the test was invalid.

With correct code now I have 4m 15s or 255 seconds, which is perfectly fine according to previous tests (my code actually is just a variations of those you guys posted before).

Here is my code:

Code:


B001 LBL B
B002 INPUT N
B003 0
B004 STO S
B005 3
B006 STO T
C001 LBL C
C002 RCL N
C003 ATAN
C004 SIN
C005 e^x
C006 RCL T
C007 x-root-of-y
C008 STO+ S
C009 DSE N
C010 GTO C001
C011 RCL S
C012 RTN

With N=1000, Radians mode, the output is displayed as 1395.34628766