In support of the 33s & 35s

[Dieter]

(01-03-2018 05:54 PM)Michael de Estrada Wrote:  As a side note, you could have reduced the run times slightly on the HP 35s by replacing the sequence 3 1/X Y^X with 3 <X root of Y>.

And that's even more accurate.

You may also squeeze out a few more seconds if you replace the "3" with a variable (e.g. RCL T) which is initialized in the first steps. Numeric constants are quite slow on the 35s, for me it looks like they are handled as equations.

(01-03-2018 05:54 PM)Michael de Estrada Wrote:  The only part of your code that I could not enter directly was CLSTK, which I replaced with CLx ENTER ENTER ENTER.

And the 33s has no line addressing, so you'll need another label. This again means that one single ENTER will do here. ;-)
BTW, line addressing is great – I really love it on the 35s.

Dieter