Post Reply 
HP calcs are really not that accurate..
12-03-2017, 01:47 AM
Post: #30
RE: HP calcs are really not that accurate..
Inspired by some other thread (where I looked at the pros and cons [but mainly the cons, the pros getting enough support already] of QPI and PSLQ), I just realised that we can "deal with" some of the issues raised in this thread in a more sophisticated and more defensible way if instead of sneaky extra digits we use (auxiliary, stateless) CAS and functions like QPI and PSLQ behind the scenes.

Would we still be talking about "lying" then, i.e. in particular when the auxiliary CAS does not know the provenance of the floats? Presumably you would need a mechanism to indicate how accurate your floats are...

More generally, how useful, magical, dangerous, perfect, .... would such a CAS-backed numerical calculator be?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: HP calcs are really not that accurate.. - AlexFekken - 12-03-2017 01:47 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)