Integration methods...an error-proof method?
|
09-02-2017, 09:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-02-2017 09:44 PM by Matt Agajanian.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Integration methods...an error-proof method?
Hi all.
Although methods like Simpson's and Trapezoidal need evaluation at the endpoint, I can see a minefield if either endpoint produces a mathematical discontinuity or undefined result thus causing an HP-67, 41, etc. program to stop. So, it seems that error-checking or implementing an error-handling flag setting (HP-41, 42, etc.). Thus, further necessitating error-handling program code. So, rather than this approach, what are some improved integration methods to avoid, aleviate, bypass, or resolve discontinuities in functions? Thanks. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Matt Agajanian - 09-02-2017 09:42 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Joe Horn - 09-02-2017, 10:21 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Matt Agajanian - 09-02-2017, 10:43 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Joe Horn - 09-02-2017, 11:05 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - AlexFekken - 09-03-2017, 02:47 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Paul Dale - 09-03-2017, 04:09 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - AlexFekken - 09-03-2017, 05:24 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Paul Dale - 09-03-2017, 06:30 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - AlexFekken - 09-03-2017, 08:07 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)