Post Reply 
[34S] Time diff. STO.00 vs. STO 00 ?
03-17-2014, 07:38 PM
Post: #32
RE: [34S] Time diff. STO.00 vs. STO 00 ?
(03-14-2014 09:09 PM)Sikuq Wrote:  I am curious as to just why the loop-cycles are not a measure of efficiency given the same accuracy?

In case of Newton's method you may not need many iterations but time consuming operations like a division are used. The digit-by-digit method may use more cycles but the operations are simple and
fast. Thus it really depends on what is going on within that loop.

HTH
Thomas
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: [34S] Time diff. STO.00 vs. STO 00 ? - Thomas Klemm - 03-17-2014 07:38 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)