newRPL: Alpha demo 0.9 released [UPDATED 2017-10-25]

[Claudio L.]

(08-17-2017 01:56 AM)The Shadow Wrote:  I've just found a weird bug, most likely in ->Q.

If I do:

-1 ACOS 0 +

I get a number which (unsurprisingly) differs from pi0 only in the 33rd digit. (I'm at the standard 32 digit precision.)

If I then do:

->Q ->NUM

I get a number starting with 3.704. By contrast, pi0 followed with ->Q ->NUM works just fine.

I'll investigate, something not right in ->Q it seems. I tried a few other numbers , using LN, EXP, etc. and can't make it fail, but pi0 0 + fails consistently. Thanks for the report.