At this point, if I were to vote for new features....
|
06-28-2017, 08:47 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: At this point, if I were to vote for new features....
Indeed, if you store in a list with :=, a copy of the list is created. This is of course inefficient but it prevents side-effects like for example if you create a matrix with 1 everywhere like this
l:=seq(1,3); m:=seq(m,3); and if you modify in place one coefficient: m[1,2]=<3 you will modify a whole column. That's the reason why =< should be used by advanced users only. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
At this point, if I were to vote for new features.... - webmasterpdx - 06-27-2017, 04:39 AM
RE: At this point, if I were to vote for new features.... - parisse - 06-27-2017, 07:03 PM
RE: At this point, if I were to vote for new features.... - toml_12953 - 06-28-2017, 05:06 PM
RE: At this point, if I were to vote for new features.... - compsystems - 06-27-2017, 07:19 PM
RE: At this point, if I were to vote for new features.... - webmasterpdx - 06-27-2017, 11:31 PM
RE: At this point, if I were to vote for new features.... - webmasterpdx - 06-28-2017, 01:41 AM
RE: At this point, if I were to vote for new features.... - webmasterpdx - 06-28-2017, 02:19 AM
RE: At this point, if I were to vote for new features.... - parisse - 06-28-2017 08:47 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)