Post Reply 
HP Prime speed vs TI-Nspire CX
11-08-2016, 07:55 PM (This post was last modified: 11-08-2016 08:01 PM by toml_12953.)
Post: #13
RE: HP Prime speed vs TI-Nspire CX
(11-08-2016 06:43 PM)jte Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 05:57 PM)StephenG1CMZ Wrote:  …The one thing that PPL lacks wrt BASIC is a GOTO statement…

This is sorta funny in that Cyrille unabashedly uses goto in the Prime source code. You don't need to convince him of its utility! Cyrille has posted about the difficulties in implementing goto in PPL.

Even C and Pascal have a GOTO statement. How hard could it be to implement it? Even though there's no explicit GOTO, any of the looping constructs must allow an internal GOTO in order to repeat the same block of code. Even if GOTO wasn't allowed to branch out of a block such as FOR or REPEAT, it could still be useful.

Tom L

Tom L
Cui bono?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: HP Prime speed vs TI-Nspire CX - jte - 11-08-2016, 06:43 PM
RE: HP Prime speed vs TI-Nspire CX - toml_12953 - 11-08-2016 07:55 PM
RE: HP Prime speed vs TI-Nspire CX - DGM - 11-08-2016, 09:10 PM
RE: HP Prime speed vs TI-Nspire CX - ttw - 11-09-2016, 08:44 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)