Post Reply 
HP 35 with 2.02 bug
11-04-2016, 01:51 AM
Post: #9
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug
(11-03-2016 10:45 PM)Didier Lachieze Wrote:  Well, if we are talking about the instruction label on the back, not the small label between the two lower feet, then on the early HP 35 units at least there was no "made in USA" as you can see on the picture of a red dot back label in the June-1972 HP Journal page 4. So this could not be the only criteria to identify a reproduction label.

My bad! That comment applies for 65 & 67 labels, where "Made in USA" is centered at the bottom on original labels, but clearly not on 35 labels as there just aint no room.

--Bob Prosperi
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
HP 35 with 2.02 bug - Harald - 11-03-2016, 07:28 PM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - Didier Lachieze - 11-03-2016, 08:05 PM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - rprosperi - 11-03-2016, 09:02 PM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - teenix - 11-05-2016, 12:19 AM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - Harald - 11-05-2016, 11:06 AM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - Harald - 11-03-2016, 09:51 PM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - Didier Lachieze - 11-03-2016, 10:45 PM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - rprosperi - 11-04-2016 01:51 AM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - Harald - 11-04-2016, 12:09 PM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - rprosperi - 11-04-2016, 02:01 PM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - aurelio - 11-03-2016, 10:13 PM
RE: HP 35 with 2.02 bug - Harald - 11-03-2016, 11:14 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)