Post Reply 
1,024 additional Registers on the CL
08-07-2016, 06:13 AM (This post was last modified: 08-07-2016 06:23 AM by Ángel Martin.)
Post: #8
RE: 1,024 additional Registers on the CL
(08-07-2016 12:00 AM)Paul Dale Wrote:  
(08-06-2016 11:26 PM)Den Belillo (Martinez Ca.) Wrote:  It should be as do-able as any other coordinate pair (or x,y,z - or x,y,z, with descriptor) storage-retrieval scheme.
Without indirect addressing it will be rather tricky Smile

ok, let's take the gauntlet and implement the INDirect addressing then, which will need to use a different implementation scheme than the native does: X-addresses go from 4FF up to 7FF, thus using the "80" mask won't work without mods. I could still use that mask and check for "08x" in S&X, but i suspect it'll be easier using an "800" mask and simply check for the XS digit.... yeah, that should work and be relatively approachable. Satay tuned!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
RE: 1,024 additional Registers on the CL - Ángel Martin - 08-07-2016 06:13 AM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)