Post Reply 
ln() vs. log()
04-19-2016, 12:48 PM (This post was last modified: 04-19-2016 01:01 PM by jebem.)
Post: #16
RE: ln() vs. log()
(04-19-2016 05:33 AM)Joe Horn Wrote:  
(04-18-2016 04:38 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote:  I'm a mechanical, so I believe that the HP32SII keyboard is the only one which is designed for the engineering calculations:

LN() and EXP() as primary(!) function,
Y^X and 1/X also as primary(!) functions.

By that criterion, the HP33s is a real winner; it not only has all four of those functions on primary keys, but has them all together as the first 4 keys on the top row! The HP-97 also has them on primary keys. Do any other models?

The amazing HP-20S and HP-21S calculators also have those four functions \(e^x\), \(LN\), \(y^x\) and \(1/x\) in the same exact positions as the HP-32SII.
In fact they have all the top row six primary functions identical to the 32SII:
\(\sqrt(x)\), \(e^x\), \(LN\), \(y^x\), \(1/x\), and \(\sum\)

Also the even more amazing HP-27S have those four functions as primary keys at the top row starting at column 3 thru 6.
It also has the \(\sqrt(x)\) at the same position as the 32SII in column 1.

I say they are all amazing because they are pure Algebraic instead of the regular RPN found in almost all of the HP machines Smile

Edited to add this:
Let us not forget the venerable HP-35!
It has those functions as primary keys as well, despite being at different positions when compared to the 32SII.

Jose Mesquita
RadioMuseum.org member

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
ln() vs. log() - Don Shepherd - 04-17-2016, 10:06 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Massimo Gnerucci - 04-17-2016, 10:15 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Han - 04-17-2016, 10:19 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Dave Shaffer - 04-17-2016, 11:50 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Tim Wessman - 04-18-2016, 01:37 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - StephenG1CMZ - 04-25-2016, 03:59 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Katie Wasserman - 04-18-2016, 02:48 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Han - 04-18-2016, 03:05 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - wojtek - 04-18-2016, 03:42 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Jeff_Kearns - 04-18-2016, 10:51 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Thomas Radtke - 04-18-2016, 01:14 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - jebem - 04-19-2016, 02:00 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Dieter - 04-19-2016, 09:47 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Tugdual - 04-18-2016, 01:25 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - emece67 - 04-18-2016, 02:41 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Andres - 05-13-2022, 10:38 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Csaba Tizedes - 04-18-2016, 04:38 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Joe Horn - 04-19-2016, 05:33 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - jebem - 04-19-2016 12:48 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Csaba Tizedes - 04-20-2016, 07:33 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - emece67 - 04-20-2016, 08:45 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - emece67 - 04-20-2016, 10:23 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - JurgenRo - 04-21-2016, 07:52 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Marcus von Cube - 04-24-2016, 02:38 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Dieter - 04-25-2016, 06:38 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Thomas Klemm - 05-13-2022, 11:15 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - KeithB - 05-16-2022, 01:18 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)