RECT_P but without filling
|
11-30-2015, 08:42 PM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: RECT_P but without filling
That's funny I made same kind of test, but I didn't test same thing as you.
I didn't think about colors, but about rectangle size. I guess bigger rectangle may be slower. here is my code, I'm varying the rect size. Code: RECT_P_NOFILL0(x,y,x2,y2,col); * avg 313 for RECT * avg 460 for LINEs LINEs solution is about 50% slower than RECT. Your bench show about 30% slower, in both case RECT is better. primer |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
RECT_P but without filling - hpfx - 11-27-2015, 01:35 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - DrD - 11-27-2015, 02:46 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - primer - 11-27-2015, 03:18 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - Tim Wessman - 11-27-2015, 11:26 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - primer - 11-30-2015, 09:04 AM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - eried - 11-30-2015, 03:33 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - Thomas_Sch - 11-30-2015, 06:08 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - eried - 11-30-2015, 06:28 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - primer - 11-30-2015 08:42 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - Han - 11-30-2015, 09:55 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - cyrille de brébisson - 12-01-2015, 06:19 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)