Post Reply 
Is RPN still relevant?
10-12-2015, 02:07 PM
Post: #19
RE: Is RPN still relevant?
For me, speaking of crunching numbers, RPN is, and will be, relavant as ever.

Algebraic is very prone to errors, with its parenthesis.

And please, don't talk about pretty print. I can give a result for an equation while one is still keystroking the equation in a pretty print calculator. (I know, not so humble, but still my opinion).

LONG LIVE RPN!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Is RPN still relevant? - Matt Agajanian - 10-05-2015, 12:57 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - ColinJDenman - 10-05-2015, 04:04 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - brouhaha - 10-06-2015, 06:07 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - CR Haeger - 10-05-2015, 12:42 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - JimP - 10-06-2015, 05:05 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Brian D - 10-06-2015, 07:49 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Harald - 10-06-2015, 09:57 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - John Colvin - 10-07-2015, 08:13 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - brickviking - 10-07-2015, 08:29 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Harald - 10-12-2015, 02:58 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Tugdual - 10-06-2015, 07:35 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Namir - 10-06-2015, 08:39 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - SlideRule - 10-07-2015, 12:15 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Thomas Klemm - 10-07-2015, 08:53 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - JimP - 10-07-2015, 10:58 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - ttw - 10-09-2015, 08:10 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Sukiari - 10-10-2015, 10:58 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Jlouis - 10-12-2015 02:07 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)