Post Reply 
Are we top heavy?
09-23-2015, 07:18 PM
Post: #15
RE: Are we top heavy?
(09-23-2015 03:43 PM)Katie Wasserman Wrote:  I realize this and I think that the percent of user who have never posted is unimportant. I started this thread only to ask people if they thought we were too intimidating to new members. Instead of seeing a lot of RTFM replies on the General forum maybe we should add a Noob (Newbie, New Members, whatever) forum where new members can get a welcoming reply.

I would hate to see a Noob forum added.

I feel we would just be trading "RTFM" replies for "this should be posted on the Noob forum" replies. And that will still not stop members from telling Noob forum members to "RTFM".

I like having the General Forum. I enjoy reading new members questions, and I enjoy the sometimes new aspects that the new members questions bring up. I have learned a lot from the discussions that result.

Your comment above begs the real question: Why do we have to be intimating at all to new members? To feel superior to them? To berate them? Why do we do that? It is fairly easy to ignore questions that might be annoying or beneath us. Just don't respond and let the rest of us enjoy the question and related responses.

Bill
Smithville, NJ
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Are we top heavy? - Katie Wasserman - 09-17-2015, 04:59 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Han - 09-17-2015, 06:59 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Thomas Klemm - 09-17-2015, 08:00 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Alex S - 09-21-2015, 08:05 PM
How could you change that? - striegel - 09-17-2015, 11:01 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - rkf - 09-18-2015, 06:53 AM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Massimo Gnerucci - 09-18-2015, 10:14 AM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Thomas Klemm - 09-18-2015, 09:09 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Katie Wasserman - 09-19-2015, 11:28 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Dwight Sturrock - 09-20-2015, 04:11 AM
RE: Are we top heavy? - jjohnson873 - 09-21-2015, 11:13 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Gerald H - 09-22-2015, 10:07 AM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Dave Hicks - 09-23-2015, 03:34 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Katie Wasserman - 09-23-2015, 03:43 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Bill (Smithville NJ) - 09-23-2015 07:18 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Katie Wasserman - 09-24-2015, 05:43 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - BruceH - 10-20-2015, 11:12 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - d b - 10-21-2015, 12:34 AM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Katie Wasserman - 10-21-2015, 02:28 AM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Sadsilence - 09-23-2015, 10:59 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Didier Lachieze - 09-23-2015, 11:43 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Thomas Radtke - 09-24-2015, 06:26 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - smp - 09-25-2015, 04:36 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - anetzer - 09-25-2015, 05:24 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - smp - 09-25-2015, 08:26 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Guenter Schink - 10-16-2015, 10:23 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Jim Horn - 09-25-2015, 03:09 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Thomas Klemm - 09-25-2015, 08:53 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Thomas Radtke - 09-26-2015, 12:15 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - ggauny@live.fr - 10-11-2015, 07:00 AM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Katie Wasserman - 10-11-2015, 02:21 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - BobVA - 10-18-2015, 09:19 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Katie Wasserman - 10-18-2015, 09:53 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Kevin Ouellet - 10-24-2015, 02:26 AM
RE: Are we top heavy? - walter b - 10-30-2015, 04:01 AM
RE: Are we top heavy? - rprosperi - 10-30-2015, 02:48 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Vtile - 10-31-2015, 03:33 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Gerald H - 10-31-2015, 05:29 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Katie Wasserman - 10-31-2015, 05:59 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Gerald H - 10-31-2015, 06:10 PM
RE: Are we top heavy? - Katie Wasserman - 11-01-2015, 02:59 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)