32sii integration memory requirements
|
12-25-2013, 06:57 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 32sii integration memory requirements
(12-25-2013 05:59 AM)Ail Wrote: The potential of the 32sii can be so much more with simply more memory.Yes, but I'm under the impression 'power-users' use different calculators ;-(. When the 33S came out, *apparently* no one was really happy with its 32kB and the question came up what to do with it when there are only single-letter lables. Finally the 35s solved that problem but at the same time severe quality problems of this line of calculators became obvious (it is a successful model nonetheless, with a known production run a couple of years after its introduction-someone mentioned the year 2010). But again, advanced users dismissed this calculator. I personally love the 32SII. It gives you no riddles, has a lot of features, great display and was quite inexpensive back then. Serves me well since the early 90th :-). |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
32sii integration memory requirements - Ail - 12-25-2013, 04:33 AM
RE: 32sii integration memory requirements - Katie Wasserman - 12-25-2013, 05:27 AM
RE: 32sii integration memory requirements - Ail - 12-25-2013, 05:59 AM
RE: 32sii integration memory requirements - Thomas Radtke - 12-25-2013 06:57 AM
RE: 32sii integration memory requirements - walter b - 12-25-2013, 11:43 AM
RE: 32sii integration memory requirements - Thomas Radtke - 12-25-2013, 01:27 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)