Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity
|
09-12-2014, 04:55 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity
A student in a German HP Prime forum came up with the reasonable question, why following inconsistency was implemented (cited via copy&paste from User_Guide_EN.pdf):
for the density function: BINOMIAL(n,k,p) for the cumulative distribution function: BINOMIAL_CDF(n,p,k) What the heck was the reason for swapping the order of 2nd and 3rd arguments? Please please HP, enlighten us!! Kind regards, Ralf. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - rkf - 09-12-2014 04:55 AM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - parisse - 09-13-2014, 08:31 AM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - Primeoprime - 09-21-2014, 05:14 PM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - parisse - 09-23-2014, 06:45 AM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - rkf - 09-24-2014, 05:52 AM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - Michael - 09-21-2014, 09:23 PM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - parisse - 09-24-2014, 07:21 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)