The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug
|
09-10-2022, 07:43 AM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug
The archived site of the late Jacques Laporte says this:
Quote:In 1972 (probably by the fall of 1972) , when the problem was discovered, HP had sold some 25000 units, but only 5000 machines were returned to have their 3 ROM chips exchanged. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Matt Agajanian - 09-07-2022, 11:16 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - teenix - 09-08-2022, 11:36 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - AndiGer - 09-09-2022, 03:33 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - RMollov - 09-09-2022, 06:25 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - teenix - 09-09-2022, 08:00 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - pauln - 09-09-2022, 05:00 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - AndiGer - 09-09-2022, 06:46 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Didier Lachieze - 09-09-2022, 08:13 PM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Kretsh - 09-10-2022, 12:23 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - CY-CL - 09-10-2022, 06:18 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - EdS2 - 09-10-2022 07:43 AM
RE: The first sign of HP-35’s ln(2.02) bug - Didier Lachieze - 09-10-2022, 01:04 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)