Why no Voyager HP-14C?

[Raymond Del Tondo]

(08-07-2021 07:23 PM)rprosperi Wrote:  As far as the 16C model number is concerned, probably no HP or other machine ever had a more appropriate model number, whoever suggested this must have been very satisfied with the idea.

Yes, but the HP-42S comes close. From a 41 perspective, the 42S may be very near to the ultimate solution;-)
Which it could have been, only lacking display quality and I/O, especially input.

And the 12C has a similar straight model number. 12 months a year, a typical divider for financial people.
Maybe it were the same people who decided for the 12C and 16C model numbers.