Calcuator forensics history question
|
04-22-2021, 02:31 AM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Calcuator forensics history question
(04-19-2021 06:08 AM)JimP Wrote: Most of us are familiar with Mike Sebastian's standard 9 sin cos tan arctan arccos arcsin routine to compare the precision of assorted calculator makes. But it wasn't the first forensics sequence that I encountered -- many years ago (>40 at least!) I seem to recollect the following being used, but I can't recall which make or model's manual suggested it. The sequence is as follows (at least in RPN, degrees mode): I tried this on my HP 50gs running newRPL firmware. Just for fun, I set the precision to 1000 digits. The result is displayed as 29.0. with the trailing '.' indicating not exact). When I subtract 29, the residual is -5.8044.E-994 which seems well within the ballpark. My HP 48G gives me 29.0000023889. This apparently is a standard HP result. Central PA, USA 16C, 48G, 39gs(newRPL), 40gs(newRPL), 50g(newRPL), Prime G2 |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)