Plus42 algebraic expressions update

[Thomas Okken]

(02-26-2021 08:21 AM)SammysHP Wrote:  I would expect that the same resolution applies as for multiple identical labels. Still unclear whether equations or programs should get a higher priority...

I'd say programs. Optimize the most common use case.

(02-26-2021 09:01 AM)Werner Wrote:  

(02-26-2021 06:37 AM)Thomas Okken Wrote:  it includes the generalized comparison functions: X=? param, 0=? param, etc.
And the Y^X fix, and a new error code for RTNERR: 8 => Too Few Arguments... forgot to add that one when I added the big stack.

What is the Y^X fix? (EDIT ah of course the sign of complex zero, silly me)
and I hope the other functions make it into Free42 as well?

Yes.

(02-26-2021 09:10 AM)Vincent Weber Wrote:  Maybe something should be done to access the parenthesis. On the 27S/17BII you have dedicated keys, but not on the 42S, so you have to dig several layers of alpha menu to find them - not so practical when you just want to close SIN(X !
I'm sure you'll also find a way to put INTEG in equations

Yes, the parentheses should be easier to reach. I could put them on [X⇄Y] and [+/-], or [Shift] [▲] and [Shift] [▼]... (Not [STO] and [RCL], I think those should insert L( and G(.)

And sure, I could make SOLVE and INTEG callable from equations... But I can already see the emails from users who are going to discover that SOLVE and INTEG don't nest!