RPN-PRGM: New Windows console application emulating HP calculators
|
02-03-2021, 06:54 AM
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
RE: RPN-PRGM: New Windows console application emulating HP calculators
(01-20-2021 08:56 PM)Aacini Wrote: So I have to wait until such companies answer my request... However, as one people at VirusTotal said: "1/60 and even 5/60 doesn’t automatically mean “Bad”, and 0/60 doesn't always mean good". You may use my RPN.exe program anyway if you trust me. Hallo Antonio, I also trusted your RPN program and went for installation. (You are better than the programmer of TI59 simulator, who's program was blocked by my computer already during download - you can compare virus check results by yourself http://www.breatharian.eu/Petr/program/d.../TI-59.zip). Your RPN.exe is very interesting and I played a little bit with it. I have to say I was very surprised and did not get reasoning that all the stack items get lost and "erased" to -1.#FLW when the stack underflows. I understand that with RPNPRGM you can use the switch but it might be useful to be able to change operation of the stack during interactive operation as well. I know nothing about X86 assembly language and your tool is a nice bridge to it and more interestingly into FPU world as well. Could you explain why I got different results for SIN COS TAN forensic test? RPN: FPUPC:0 9 Deg Sin Cos Tan ATan ACos ASin FIX:16 9.0338335037231445 RPN: FPUPC:2 9 Deg Sin Cos Tan ATan ACos ASin FIX:16 9.0000000001046097 RPN: FPUPC:3 9 Deg Sin Cos Tan ATan ACos ASin FIX:16 8.9999999999999130 RPN.exe users manual Wrote:RPN FPUPC:0 9 Deg Sin Cos Tan ATan ACos ASin FIX:16. The exact result of this expression is 9, but the real results are 9.0338315963745117, 9.0000000001046061 and 9.0000000000002736 when the precision is set to 0, 2 and 3, respectively. For RAD I have the same result as you stated in the manual. I have an Intel CPU. I decided to donate $10 and I admire your skills and effort. Thank you for sharing this program. KR Pavel |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)