HP42s first major program (Double Integral) Best way to approach?
|
06-15-2020, 12:25 AM
Post: #59
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP42s first major program (Double Integral) Best way to approach?
(05-27-2020 08:27 PM)DM48 Wrote: I am looking to make this the fastest calculation possible with at least five, preferably six decimals. Previous post HV1(m), if you plot it (m = 0 to 1), it look like a straight line, HV1 ≈ 2/3*m Using a trick I learned earlier, for asinc(x), using Mathematica: In[1]:= <<Calculus`Pade` In[2]:= hv1[m_] := ((m+1) EllipticE[m] + (m-1) EllipticK[m]) / 3 In[3]:= EconomizedRationalApproximation[hv1[m]/m, {m,{0,0.75},2,2}] Results coded in Lua, for m ≤ 0.7, this get about 6 digits accuracy. Code: function hv1(m) Adding back dimensions to test the result: lua> function hv(d,D) return D^3 * hv1((d/D)^2) end lua> v2 = hv(24, 58) lua> v1 = hv(24, 48) lua> print(v2, v1, v2-v1) 25664.275659138966 21013.02544172724 4651.250217411725 For reference, this is EKmc HV version Free42: 48 Enter 58 Enter 24 XEQ "HV" - 25664.27923311925502790987133042097 − 21013.03279650214793028432717211253 = 4651.24643661710709762554415830844 |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)