Post Reply 
When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE
05-24-2019, 02:35 PM (This post was last modified: 05-24-2019 02:37 PM by Thomas Okken.)
Post: #10
RE: When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE
(05-24-2019 02:00 PM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote:  CHS
ISG X


Two steps also, but Andrés Rodríguez’s solution should be still one byte shorter.

Andrés' solution looks unbeatable on size, but it is slower. Not a lot slower, to be honest, since it takes advantage of special cases in ACOS and SIN, so it really is quite brilliant. I wish I had thought of it. Smile

CHS ISG X is flawed because the ISG skips the next instruction in the 0 → 1 case...
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE - Gene - 05-23-2019, 11:51 PM
RE: When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE - Thomas Okken - 05-24-2019, 12:00 AM
RE: When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE - rprosperi - 05-24-2019, 01:08 AM
RE: When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE - Gene - 05-24-2019, 12:44 AM
RE: When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE - Paul Dale - 05-24-2019, 04:10 AM
RE: When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE - Andres - 05-24-2019, 12:59 PM
RE: When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE - Thomas Okken - 05-24-2019 02:35 PM
RE: When ISZ/DSZ > ISG/DSE - Andres - 05-28-2019, 09:41 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)