Post Reply 
So.. any improvements RPN-wise ???
04-03-2019, 06:21 PM
Post: #23
RE: So.. any improvements RPN-wise ???
(03-22-2019 09:25 AM)Tim Wessman Wrote:  RPN does not suck. You just can't program in RPN/RPL.

While it was highly satisfying to come up with a really compact RPL program (like Joe Horn's parallel resistors program \<< * LASTARG + / \>> ), using PPL is definitely better for longer programs. When I look back at some of my old RPL code, I have to step through them to remember what in the world I was doing. It's not unlike when I look back through my old ASM code.

One thing in my pipe dream wish list would be the ability to access and modify the RPN stack from within a PPL program. That would make RPN much more robust.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
RE: So.. any improvements RPN-wise ??? - Wes Loewer - 04-03-2019 06:21 PM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)