Post Reply 
Constants that Aren't
11-17-2018, 03:14 PM (This post was last modified: 11-17-2018 09:08 PM by StephenG1CMZ.)
Post: #4
RE: Constants that Aren't
(11-17-2018 03:02 PM)BruceH Wrote:  Sky News reports the decision with a helpful comparison to help the reader appreciate the size of the problem:
Quote:Although the mother of all kilograms has only been taken out of its protective case four times in the last century, it has lost atoms and therefore mass.
It amounts to just 20 billionths of a gram, about the weight of an eyelash, but those small changes are important to maintaining accuracy.

I never realised my eyelashes were so light. I wonder why I find it so hard to open my eyes first thing in the morning then? :-)

Ah, that might be because we are in the uk...where a billionth is a thousand times heavier than in the us (or used to be).
Edit: Oops, that should be lighter. Thanks grsbanks.

Stephen Lewkowicz (G1CMZ)
https://my.numworks.com/python/steveg1cmz
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Constants that Aren't - mark4flies - 11-17-2018, 12:29 PM
RE: Constants that Aren't - Tim Wessman - 11-17-2018, 01:31 PM
RE: Constants that Aren't - BruceH - 11-17-2018, 03:02 PM
RE: Constants that Aren't - StephenG1CMZ - 11-17-2018 03:14 PM
RE: Constants that Aren't - Stevetuc - 11-17-2018, 03:23 PM
RE: Constants that Aren't - grsbanks - 11-17-2018, 05:20 PM
RE: Constants that Aren't - KeithB - 11-21-2018, 07:02 PM
RE: Constants that Aren't - JimP - 11-22-2018, 05:53 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)