Post Reply 
(12C) Base Conversion
08-25-2018, 06:38 PM
Post: #3
RE: (12C) Base Conversion
(08-25-2018 05:28 PM)rprosperi Wrote:  Oddly, the same is not true with generic register storage; it seems the same logic would hold in these cases too.
Anyone have a suggestion why these behaviors would be different?

To claim HP disable financial register stack-lift on purpose is a bit weak.
This could explain away almost anything, even above odd behavior
(real use cases suggest ... it is documented ... uh, it is a feature)

Sadly, by claiming bug as feature, it will never get fixed.

My first time beaten by this type of "feature" is with RCL (Yes, it is also documented)
Say, 5 is stored in memory 0, with a clear stack:

5 * 5: RCL 0 Enter x => 25 -- so far so good
5 * 4: RCL 0 Enter 1 - x => 100 -- ???
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
(12C) Base Conversion - Thomas Klemm - 08-25-2018, 02:32 PM
RE: (12C) Base Conversion - rprosperi - 08-25-2018, 05:28 PM
RE: (12C) Base Conversion - Albert Chan - 08-25-2018 06:38 PM
RE: (12C) Base Conversion - Dieter - 08-25-2018, 08:38 PM
RE: (12C) Base Conversion - rprosperi - 08-25-2018, 09:02 PM
RE: (12C) Base Conversion - Albert Chan - 08-25-2018, 11:06 PM
RE: (12C) Base Conversion - Thomas Klemm - 08-25-2018, 08:30 PM
RE: (12C) Base Conversion - Thomas Klemm - 08-27-2018, 08:29 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)