Post Reply 
HP-IL checksums or not
11-24-2017, 01:41 AM
Post: #2
RE: HP-IL checksums or not
I think you're right about separating the application domain for checksums between data storage and data transmission. The reliability of modern storage these days is pretty much a given, so storing the checksum with the data may not be entirely justified. That leaves transmission, and since computing the checksum is reasonably cheap each side can exchange their checksum result as part of the transmission acknowledgement protocol.

After all, what use is a checksum if you don't use it?
~Mark

Remember kids, "In a democracy, you get the government you deserve."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
HP-IL checksums or not - hth - 11-23-2017, 06:31 PM
RE: HP-IL checksums or not - mfleming - 11-24-2017 01:41 AM
RE: HP-IL checksums or not - hth - 11-26-2017, 05:16 AM
RE: HP-IL checksums or not - AlexFekken - 11-26-2017, 06:06 AM
RE: HP-IL checksums or not - mfleming - 11-26-2017, 06:28 AM
RE: HP-IL checksums or not - hth - 11-27-2017, 07:04 PM
RE: HP-IL checksums or not - mfleming - 11-28-2017, 02:35 AM
RE: HP-IL checksums or not - jsi - 11-28-2017, 06:06 PM
RE: HP-IL checksums or not - hth - 12-11-2017, 12:53 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)