hp35s amazon reviews VS MoHPC reviews

[DA74254]

(10-29-2017 10:01 AM)Gerald H Wrote:  Negative reviews in the Forum probably due to the data in this veridical document:

http://www.hpmuseum.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/...i?read=735

I find the 35s very comfortable to use & programme.

Removed the part of the quote I cannot verify as mine is not defective.
Anyway, I tried the first few of the "buggy" things listed at the mentioned link.

Cos 89,9999999999 (10 9's behind decimal point) Gives 1,74532925199E-12
Wolfram Alpha: 1,74532925199(cont:43295769...)E-12
Within the "range" of the 35s, it's correct.

Tan 89,9999999999: 572957795131
Wolfram: 572957795130,876798...

Please tell me where (and what) is "dud" here.

Listing 5 I don't understand as one can only have 800 indirect stored instances..?

And so, except from not giving "i" in sqrt(-1) and not giving 0^0 as undef (or, as some claim; 1) I'm satisfied with my unit. It works for my planetary calculations. It's easy to program and the RPN is true to the 4-reg stack.
I'd happily give it a 4* reduced for those last things I mentioned.