Search
Member List
Calendar
Help
|
Important Request
|
|
04-03-2017, 03:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-03-2017 03:25 PM by Tim Wessman.)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Important Request
When there is no equivalent calculation of "error" for ALL fit types currently presented, what would I compare?
I'd be fine to implement something, but I have not seen any math that applies to all fit types! Using one type of error calculation mixed with a different type simply messes things up due to bias in the various types of calculating things. TW Although I work for HP, the views and opinions I post here are my own. |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Important Request - math7 - 04-02-2017, 08:33 PM
RE: Important Request - Tim Wessman - 04-02-2017, 09:03 PM
RE: Important Request - math7 - 04-02-2017, 11:25 PM
RE: Important Request - Paul Dale - 04-02-2017, 11:32 PM
RE: Important Request - math7 - 04-03-2017, 04:16 AM
RE: Important Request - Joe Horn - 04-03-2017, 04:56 AM
RE: Important Request - cyrille de brébisson - 04-03-2017, 05:43 AM
RE: Important Request - mark4flies - 04-03-2017, 01:18 PM
RE: Important Request - Tim Wessman - 04-03-2017 03:24 PM
RE: Important Request - math7 - 04-03-2017, 06:49 PM
RE: Important Request - johnet123 - 04-03-2017, 07:52 PM
RE: Important Request - Tim Wessman - 04-03-2017, 08:25 PM
RE: Important Request - math7 - 04-03-2017, 11:30 PM
RE: Important Request - Tim Wessman - 04-04-2017, 03:31 AM
RE: Important Request - Han - 04-04-2017, 03:41 AM
RE: Important Request - math7 - 04-03-2017, 11:43 PM
RE: Important Request - math7 - 04-04-2017, 04:49 AM
RE: Important Request - Joe Horn - 04-04-2017, 05:48 AM
RE: Important Request - Tim Wessman - 04-04-2017, 05:12 PM
RE: Important Request - math7 - 04-05-2017, 04:46 AM
RE: Important Request - jte - 04-05-2017, 07:22 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)