Search
Member List
Calendar
Help
|
ln() vs. log()
|
|
04-17-2016, 10:06 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
ln() vs. log()
I have often wondered why these two functions exist. Many calculators (HP 17b, HP 65, TI 84+) have both. Some (12c) have only one (ln). Interestingly, the original Dartmouth BASIC had log() but it was really ln().
Is one more accurate than the other? Why the two standards? |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
ln() vs. log() - Don Shepherd - 04-17-2016 10:06 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Massimo Gnerucci - 04-17-2016, 10:15 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Han - 04-17-2016, 10:19 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Dave Shaffer - 04-17-2016, 11:50 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Tim Wessman - 04-18-2016, 01:37 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - StephenG1CMZ - 04-25-2016, 03:59 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Katie Wasserman - 04-18-2016, 02:48 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Han - 04-18-2016, 03:05 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - wojtek - 04-18-2016, 03:42 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Alejandro Paz(Germany) - 04-18-2016, 04:00 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Jeff_Kearns - 04-18-2016, 10:51 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Thomas Radtke - 04-18-2016, 01:14 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - jebem - 04-19-2016, 02:00 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Dieter - 04-19-2016, 09:47 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Tugdual - 04-18-2016, 01:25 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - emece67 - 04-18-2016, 02:41 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Andres - 05-13-2022, 10:38 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Csaba Tizedes - 04-18-2016, 04:38 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Joe Horn - 04-19-2016, 05:33 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - jebem - 04-19-2016, 12:48 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Csaba Tizedes - 04-20-2016, 07:33 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - emece67 - 04-20-2016, 08:45 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - emece67 - 04-20-2016, 10:23 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - JurgenRo - 04-21-2016, 07:52 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Marcus von Cube - 04-24-2016, 02:38 PM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Dieter - 04-25-2016, 06:38 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - Thomas Klemm - 05-13-2022, 11:15 AM
RE: ln() vs. log() - KeithB - 05-16-2022, 01:18 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)