56-bit representation of numbers vs. what is displayed
|
02-11-2016, 04:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-12-2016 07:25 PM by brianrhill.)
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 56-bit representation of numbers vs. what is displayed
Thanks! That makes a ton of sense. It means the display isn't always determined from what is in register X (also known as C). Sometimes it is showing a non-normalized value cooked up from A and B. My simulation job just got harder :)
EDIT/PS: Your explanation helped me home in on this information in Francois Roulet's re-creation of Jacques Laporte's site (the specific page is http://home.citycable.ch/pierrefleur/Jac...te/A&R.htm): The A register is setup to hold the displayed number with the digits in the proper order. The B regisĀter is used as a masking register with digits 9 inserted for each display position that is to be blanked and a digit 2 at the decimal point location. The decimal point is not allocated a register position; but it has a full digit position in the output display : one digit and the decimal point share one of the 14 digit times. When the anode driver of output display unit detects a decimal point code during T4, it provides a signal to the cathode driver of the output display unit to move to the next digit position. The digit 9 mask in register B allows both trailing and leading zeros to be blanked (i.e., by programming 9's into the B register). Use of all three working registers for display (the C register to retain the number in normalized form, the A register to hold the number in the displayed form, and the B register as a mask) allows the calculator to have easily both a floating point and a scientific display format. This scheme will be used in all Classic & Woodstock calculators. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
56-bit representation of numbers vs. what is displayed - brianrhill - 02-11-2016, 01:13 AM
RE: 56-bit representation of numbers vs. what is displayed - brouhaha - 02-11-2016, 02:37 AM
RE: 56-bit representation of numbers vs. what is displayed - brianrhill - 02-11-2016 04:50 AM
RE: 56-bit representation of numbers vs. what is displayed - damaltor - 02-11-2016, 04:48 PM
RE: 56-bit representation of numbers vs. what is displayed - brianrhill - 02-11-2016, 11:18 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)