Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF
|
10-18-2015, 08:50 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF
(10-18-2015 06:23 PM)Arno K Wrote: On writing a program for the kind of hypothesis test that are usual in Germany I discovered the following bug: BINOMIAL_ICDF() does not provide the result below the given probability, instead it results to the nearest integer value: So help me understand your thinking here. I'm sick today and not thinking well so chances are I am just not understanding right. You have: BINOMIAL_CDF(20,0.6,7) -> ~.0210 BINOMIAL_CDF(20,0.6,8) -> ~.0565 The target is .05. There only seems to be one possible result there that works to me. Note that every math program I've tried here agrees it should be 8 as well. Why then would the inverse not hold true? 7 would be too small. 8 contains your desired target. Are you advocating a non-integer result? How would that be definted since we are talking about trials here? TW Although I work for HP, the views and opinions I post here are my own. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF - Arno K - 10-18-2015, 06:23 PM
RE: Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF - Dieter - 10-18-2015, 08:46 PM
RE: Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF - Tim Wessman - 10-18-2015 08:50 PM
RE: Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF - Dieter - 10-18-2015, 09:05 PM
RE: Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF - Arno K - 10-18-2015, 09:15 PM
RE: Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF - lrdheat - 10-18-2015, 08:53 PM
RE: Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF - lrdheat - 10-18-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Bug in BINOMIAL_ICDF - Dieter - 10-20-2015, 06:48 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)