Post Reply 
HP35s Revisited Trig Quandary Bug # 2
02-17-2015, 09:18 PM
Post: #20
RE: HP35s Revisited Trig Quandary Bug # 2
(02-17-2015 09:07 PM)Thomas Klemm Wrote:  
(02-17-2015 06:00 PM)MarkHaysHarris777 Wrote:  Consequently, its too slow for calculating millions of digits of PI, or multiple transcendentals of hundreds of thousands of digits (not that many people except geeks like me do that, I get it).

(02-17-2015 08:45 PM)MarkHaysHarris777 Wrote:  (I normally run my units in FIX 4, because it makes the most sense)

At least you are consistent.

I am most certainly consistent... and your argument is a non sequitur. As an interest in high speed number crunching (a personal excursion into number theory, prime research, and encryption) I run my -- PC -- late at night while I'm asleep crunching out transcendentals to many hundreds of thousands of digits.

I set my calculator (HP35s) to FIX 4, or ENG 4.

PS SIN has the same problem on the ZERO end, that COSINE has at pi/2. Set your HP35s to FIX 4 and run SIN(.0001) ; similar to COS(89.9999)
Oh look, its the same value either way-> 1.7453E-6 (very reasonable answer)

PSS its also the same internal value either way... 174532925000

Cheers,
marcus
Smile

Kind regards,
marcus
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: HP35s Revisited Trig Quandary Bug # 2 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-17-2015 09:18 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)