Post Reply 
Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion
10-18-2014, 05:57 PM
Post: #6
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion
Yes, you are.

Free42: SIN(3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 503) =
-1.15802 83060 06248 94179 02505 54076 922 e-34, correct to 34 digits

WP34S: SIN(3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 503) =
-1.15802 83060 06248 91773 57874 54453 501 e-34, correct to 17 digits

Werner
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - Werner - 10-18-2014 05:57 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)