HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File"
|
12-17-2022, 01:14 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File"
(12-17-2022 09:33 AM)J-F Garnier Wrote: I'm surprised nobody seem to remember that it's dangerous to have no working file with the Extended Functions module 1B. Thanks J-F, I certainly did not recall this particular warning's effects, but it may be because of this effect that I recalled some functions can leave it undefined?? Was this bug fixed in the 1C version included in the CX, or did they simply add the warning into the User Manual (no longer requiring an addendum)? --Bob Prosperi |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - TomC - 12-16-2022, 04:42 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - Sylvain Cote - 12-16-2022, 07:00 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - TomC - 12-16-2022, 07:56 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - Sylvain Cote - 12-17-2022, 03:33 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - rprosperi - 12-16-2022, 09:09 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - Gene - 12-16-2022, 11:35 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - J-F Garnier - 12-17-2022, 09:33 AM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - rprosperi - 12-17-2022 01:14 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - Sylvain Cote - 12-17-2022, 03:20 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - J-F Garnier - 12-17-2022, 03:49 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - Sylvain Cote - 12-18-2022, 02:41 PM
RE: HP41CX - Naive' question - "Current File" - J-F Garnier - 12-17-2022, 03:15 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)