Post Reply 
Four?! Why not more?
06-14-2021, 06:56 PM (This post was last modified: 06-14-2021 06:57 PM by Matt Agajanian.)
Post: #13
RE: Four?! Why not more?
(06-14-2021 01:21 AM)Steve Simpkin Wrote:  <Large Snip>

This last factor (and tradition) probably kept HP's later calculator models at 4-levels. The addition of a Last X register starting with the HP-45 also helped.

<End Snip>

Well, since including a Last X register began with the 45 in the Classic series, the tech was already there. So,
why not include the Last X register beginning with the 21?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Four?! Why not more? - Matt Agajanian - 06-14-2021, 12:21 AM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - mfleming - 06-14-2021, 12:27 AM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Steve Simpkin - 06-14-2021, 01:21 AM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Matt Agajanian - 06-14-2021 06:56 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Steve Simpkin - 06-14-2021, 07:49 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - teenix - 06-14-2021, 10:07 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - rprosperi - 06-14-2021, 02:55 AM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - OlidaBel - 06-14-2021, 08:45 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Matt Agajanian - 06-14-2021, 03:13 AM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - rprosperi - 06-14-2021, 10:45 AM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Matt Agajanian - 06-14-2021, 06:50 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Garth Wilson - 06-14-2021, 03:33 AM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Steve Simpkin - 06-14-2021, 12:08 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Bram - 06-15-2021, 06:32 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - KeithB - 06-14-2021, 01:43 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - hth - 06-14-2021, 05:10 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - ChanTran - 06-14-2021, 08:46 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Steve Simpkin - 06-14-2021, 09:15 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - twoweims - 06-14-2021, 10:01 PM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Garth Wilson - 06-15-2021, 01:30 AM
RE: Four?! Why not more? - Peet - 06-15-2021, 08:19 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)