Post Reply 
Serious bug in beta 4/16
04-19-2021, 02:17 PM
Post: #10
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16
Hello,

It was an uninitialized variable issue..
a flag that was meant to indicate if the CAS. prefix was needed was not always initialized...
Depending on what you had in RAM prior to using the function, you could get this or that happening...

Cyrille

Although I work for the HP calculator group, the views and opinions I post here are my own. I do not speak for HP.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Serious bug in beta 4/16 - jonmoore - 04-18-2021, 06:58 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - trojdor - 04-18-2021, 07:21 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - toml_12953 - 04-18-2021, 08:29 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - akmon - 04-18-2021, 09:10 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - jonmoore - 04-18-2021, 09:21 PM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - toml_12953 - 04-19-2021, 09:36 AM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - jonmoore - 04-19-2021, 10:41 AM
RE: Serious bug in beta 4/16 - cyrille de brébisson - 04-19-2021 02:17 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)