Evolution of Conditional Tests
|
01-08-2020, 11:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-08-2020 05:48 PM by J-F Garnier.)
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests
I always wondered why the 29C tests were so different from the 25/25C, but taking into account the intro date, it makes sense. The comparison tests of the 29C were aligned with the 67 and then adopted for the series 30.
(01-04-2020 12:58 AM)Sylvain Cote Wrote: A little out of subject, but for the HP-41 the missing tests can be simulated: Same trick can be used to port a 25/25C program using its specific tests to the HP67/29/33/34/11. Code: HP25 HP67/29/33/34/11 But what about the X>=Y? and X<Y? tests that have no reverse on the HP67/29/33/34/11 ? There is a 3-step solution for X>=Y? : Code: HP25 HP67/29/33/34/11 J-F |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Evolution of Conditional Tests - David Hayden - 01-03-2020, 09:28 PM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - Dave Britten - 01-03-2020, 09:36 PM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - Thomas Okken - 01-03-2020, 11:41 PM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - rprosperi - 01-03-2020, 11:48 PM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - Dave Britten - 01-04-2020, 12:08 AM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - Valentin Albillo - 01-04-2020, 12:26 AM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - Dave Britten - 01-04-2020, 12:33 AM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - Sylvain Cote - 01-04-2020, 12:58 AM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - J-F Garnier - 01-08-2020 11:11 AM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - Garth Wilson - 01-04-2020, 03:44 AM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - Sylvain Cote - 01-04-2020, 04:22 AM
RE: Evolution of Conditional Tests - Ángel Martin - 01-04-2020, 07:03 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)