Post Reply 
HP 50g Double factorial
05-02-2019, 09:34 PM
Post: #17
RE: HP 50g Double factorial
(05-01-2019 07:01 PM)Giuseppe Donnini Wrote:  I cannot confirm this behavior. If n!! is too large, I get MAXR, i.e. 9.99999999999E499.
You must be using ZINTs, then. As a matter of fact, I wrote the code with an HP-48 in mind, so it is primarily intended for floats.

Again, this must be a ZINT-specific message.

Sorry Giuseppe, you are right. The answer will be given after about 21 seconds for number 9999. I was just confused, the other program versions end immediately.

Kind regards,
Joerg
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
HP 50g Double factorial - joeres - 05-01-2019, 11:19 AM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - Gilles - 05-01-2019, 01:40 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - joeres - 05-01-2019, 03:57 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - Gilles - 05-01-2019, 04:14 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - joeres - 05-01-2019, 06:01 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - John Keith - 05-01-2019, 07:00 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - joeres - 05-02-2019, 08:33 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - grsbanks - 05-01-2019, 04:59 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - Gilles - 05-01-2019, 07:06 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - Albert Chan - 05-01-2019, 06:17 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - joeres - 05-01-2019, 06:26 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - joeres - 05-02-2019 09:34 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - joeres - 05-01-2019, 06:35 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - FLISZT - 01-27-2024, 05:57 AM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - DavidM - 01-27-2024, 01:50 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - FLISZT - 01-27-2024, 05:51 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - DavidM - 01-27-2024, 09:33 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - FLISZT - 01-28-2024, 01:47 AM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - DavidM - 01-28-2024, 02:51 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - FLISZT - 01-28-2024, 07:07 PM
RE: HP 50g Double factorial - John Keith - 01-28-2024, 08:48 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)