Side benefit from Runge-Kutta methods for ODE
|
09-27-2018, 10:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2018 02:41 AM by Namir.)
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Side benefit from Runge-Kutta methods for ODE
Has anyone tried to fake an f(x) into an f(x,y) by doing somethin like this:
f(x,y) = g(x) + y - y where g(x) is the original function of x? :-) Namir .... a truly original thinker .... LOL PS: Maybe I am pulling a Ramanujan on this one. He presumably proved that: c = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ... + n = -1/12 In his proof, Ramanujan corrupted the equations he was using in calculating (c - 3c) and finagled the corrupted equations into giving -1/12, which of course is very wrong! |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Side benefit from Runge-Kutta methods for ODE - Namir - 09-23-2018, 07:27 AM
RE: Side benefit from Runge-Kutta methods for ODE - ttw - 09-24-2018, 06:54 AM
RE: Side benefit from Runge-Kutta methods for ODE - Namir - 09-26-2018, 04:43 PM
RE: Side benefit from Runge-Kutta methods for ODE - Valentin Albillo - 09-26-2018, 10:45 PM
RE: Side benefit from Runge-Kutta methods for ODE - Thomas Klemm - 09-27-2018, 02:11 AM
RE: Side benefit from Runge-Kutta methods for ODE - Namir - 09-27-2018, 09:03 AM
RE: Side benefit from Runge-Kutta methods for ODE - Namir - 09-27-2018 10:03 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)