New G2 HP Prime
|
08-31-2018, 12:29 AM
Post: #93
|
|||
|
|||
RE: New G2 HP Prime
(08-30-2018 10:56 PM)Anders Wrote:(08-30-2018 10:02 PM)Claudio L. Wrote: If you look at Xerxes's list, you'll see he has done this test on hundreds of machines, so right now is not the time to change the testing pattern. Every other implementation (I think) was tested with all the overhead to solve one problem. If you need to run that multiple times, you run it in a loop, and measure outside the loop, then divide by the number of executions.Yes and you can be sure that I understand that. However, The timing should be looped algorithm per second. If the measurement is done by a human then a suitable long long time should limit the error involved. Timing a minute and forty seconds or 100_s is too error prone. I'd say 16_min 40_s or 1000_s (a kilosecond) would do it. Unfortunately if some old machine runs the algorithm ONCE in over 3_h then it's about 0.083 algorithm/s? How much time it takes for a Ferris wheel to turn one round? How about a turbine engine? We use revolutions per minute for car engines. MIPS = Million Instructions Per Second That's what we should use for calculators. Just my flow of thoughts at about 3:30 AM (I woke up) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)