Decimals to improper fractions program?
|
08-13-2018, 10:09 PM
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Decimals to improper fractions program?
(08-13-2018 03:03 AM)Albert Chan Wrote:(06-09-2018 02:54 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote: In engineering practice more important the relative error. In this case the results are: I think the idea of the table is to give a fraction that – at least – matches a certain accuracy level. So if you need an accuracy of 0,001% or better, 355/113 is the first fraction to meet that target. (08-13-2018 03:03 AM)Albert Chan Wrote: I agree that relative error is more useful than digits matched. That's exactly why I prefer stating the number of matching digits. But I am not an engineer. ;-) Dieter |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)