[VA] SRC #011 - April 1st, 2022 Bizarro Special
|
04-05-2022, 05:20 PM
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [VA] SRC #011 - April 1st, 2022 Bizarro Special
(04-05-2022 07:23 AM)J-F Garnier Wrote:(04-04-2022 10:34 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: Sorry but it doesn't fly. That x2=1+rnd doesn't appear explicitly in the integrand expression as such, only x2-x1 in both numerator and denominator, and further it only appears when using your stochastic method, not if using other possible methods. Thus, I don't think that rawi, when trying to compute the value of the integrand as it appears in my OP, would think or know about the need to add 1 to x2, which is only implicit in the [d, d+1] limits of integration and only when substituting d=1, thus he'd surely get 0 divided by 0 as I said he would. J-F Garnier Wrote:Valentin Albillo Wrote: It doesn't fly either, you could have used 1E3, which aligns properly with 100, 200 and 500, and furthermore you include 20 and 50 which don't align with them either and you didn't seem to mind. Best regards. V. All My Articles & other Materials here: Valentin Albillo's HP Collection |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)