WP 34S --> WP 31S
|
04-13-2014, 12:17 PM
Post: #301
|
|||
|
|||
RE: WP 34S --> WP 31S
You missed the reflection formula to produce an analytic continuation for entire real and complex domains (excepting negative integers and zero of course)
![]() The 34S does all of these BTW using a rather more modern approximation from memory. Sadly, this is one function that took a couple of goes to get accurate but worth the effort nonetheless. - Pauli |
|||
04-13-2014, 02:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-13-2014 03:51 PM by Thomas Klemm.)
Post: #302
|
|||
|
|||
RE: WP 34S --> WP 31S | |||
04-13-2014, 09:25 PM
Post: #303
|
|||
|
|||
RE: WP 34S --> WP 31S
I'd still posit that coding the iterative version is now easier than the change to the tail recursive form
![]() Yes, I missed the exit condition, that wasn't my intention in that code snippet. - Pauli |
|||
04-14-2014, 01:17 AM
Post: #304
|
|||
|
|||
RE: WP 34S --> WP 31S
What if "coding the iterative version" isn't supported by the language?
|
|||
04-14-2014, 01:33 AM
Post: #305
|
|||
|
|||
RE: WP 34S --> WP 31S | |||
04-14-2014, 08:42 AM
Post: #306
|
|||
|
|||
RE: WP 34S --> WP 31S
How about running a poll? Should be in a new thread, however.
![]() d:-) |
|||
04-14-2014, 10:12 AM
Post: #307
|
|||
|
|||
RE: WP 34S --> WP 31S | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)