Re: calculator condition proposal Message #13 Posted by Jim Creybohm on 29 May 2004, 3:35 p.m., in response to message #1 by Mike
I think what is really being asked is how can we, as a group of persons interested in HP calcs, define conditions of calcs. I would like to propose we examine a standard. Please note, this proposal is a sketch, not a blueprint.
OK, so an opinion:
NIB - aka the holy grail
New in box. Unused, plastic wrap, complete - 'nuff said.
Mint
As NIB except has been opened/used albeit briefly. No visible defects, blemishes or grime.
---- this is where a certain amount of subjectivity comes in
Excellent
Has been opened and used lightly. May have minor visible defects, blemishes, but should not have keyboard grime, nor scratches on the screen.
Good
Has been used, and will show normal wear and tear of calculator commensurate with its age. For example, a used 21 might be in worse condition than a used 48GX. May have grime, scratches but is working and could continue as a working calculator.
Fair
Used, may or may not be working. Scratches, grime are expected.
Poor
Non working or partial operation, visible damage.
Parts only or non-working
Enough said.
There can be some crossover if describing components e.g., excellent overall condition, with a poor battery compartment. This might be how I would describe the above mentioned unit.
What might be a good idea might be to create a table or spreadsheet of important componentry (keyboard / screen / battery compartment / manuals) and use this as a general guideline to determine value.
anyways, I'd be interested in hearing from other more knowledgeable persons on this subject, but I think it is an excellent topic.
12345
|