Post Reply 
Local Variables Not on Stack?
09-01-2014, 01:37 PM
Post: #1
Local Variables Not on Stack?
Is there a way to define local variables that doesn't require them to be pulled from the stack?

Tom L
I think therefore I am-Descartes
I think therefore you are-Gorgias
You're not here to think-Army Sergeant
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-01-2014, 02:01 PM
Post: #2
RE: Local Variables Not on Stack?
(09-01-2014 01:37 PM)toml_12953 Wrote:  Is there a way to define local variables that doesn't require them to be pulled from the stack?

Which calculator are you talking about?

d:-?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-01-2014, 04:17 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2014 04:18 PM by toml_12953.)
Post: #3
RE: Local Variables Not on Stack?
(09-01-2014 02:01 PM)walter b Wrote:  
(09-01-2014 01:37 PM)toml_12953 Wrote:  Is there a way to define local variables that doesn't require them to be pulled from the stack?

Which calculator are you talking about?

d:-?
Oops sorry! I have the 50g. I figured it out anyway. I just have to have the program put the values on the stack:

Code:
<<0 0 0 -> a b c << program goes here with local variables a, b, c>> >>

Tom L
I think therefore I am-Descartes
I think therefore you are-Gorgias
You're not here to think-Army Sergeant
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)