Post Reply 
cubic solver
09-08-2023, 02:26 PM (This post was last modified: 03-03-2024 11:58 PM by Albert Chan.)
Post: #1
cubic solver
This program solve x^3 = a*x + b, for x

Code:
cubic_ab(a,b) := 
BEGIN
LOCAL d;
a, b := a/3, b/2;    /* x^3 = (3a)*x + (2b) */
d := sqrt(b^2-a^3) * (-1)^(sign(re(b))==-1);
b := surd(b+d, 3);
return [a/b, b];     /* alpha, beta */
END;
Code:
cubic(a,b) :=
BEGIN
LOCAL w := exp(2*pi/3*i);
[[1,1],[w,conj(w)],[conj(w),w]] * cubic_ab(a,b);
END;

Michael Penn's example




Let x = sin(θ) + cos(θ), it reduced to cubic: x^3 = 3*x - 11/8

Cas> r := cubic(3, -11/8)
Cas> simplify(r)                 → [1/2,    (3*√5-1)/4,       (-3*√5-1)/4]
Cas> float(Ans)                  → [0.5, 1.42705098312, −1.92705098312]
Cas> float(r)                      → [1.42705098312, −1.92705098312, 0.5]

We have Cas simplify bug here! symbolic and approximate numbers don't match.
Luckily, the algorithm doesn't care which cube roots is used (no need for principle root).

But, this bug should be fixed.

Cas> b := cubic_ab(3, -11/8) [2]     → (1/256*(-√15*48*i-176))^(1/3)
Cas> polar(float(b))                         → 1., −0.77627903074
Cas> polar(simplify(b))                    → 1 , atan(√15)

Simplify bug had phase angle off by 2*pi/3:

Cas> atan(√15) - 2*pi/3.0               → −0.77627903074

Update: cubic_ab(a,b) code explained here
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2023, 02:44 PM
Post: #2
RE: cubic solver
Root simplify returned wrong (not principle) root bug existed for XCas 1.5.0

But, it is worse on XCas 1.9.0-31 (mingw32 win32)
Result does not match phase *and* magnitude.

XCas> b := (1/256*(-√15*48*i-176))^(1/3)
XCas> polar(float(b))

1.0, -0.77627903074

XCas> simplify(polar(b))                     // good

\(\displaystyle 1\;,\;\frac{-\pi +\arctan \left(\frac{3}{11} \sqrt{15}\right)}{3}\)

XCas> simplify(polar(simplify(b)))       // bad

\(256\;,\;-\pi +\arctan \left(\frac{3}{11} \sqrt{15}\right)\)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2023, 06:56 PM
Post: #3
RE: cubic solver
Yes, there is an additional check in recent versions of Xcas, and here it failed because an argument was not reduced mod 2*pi.
https://github.com/geogebra/giac/commit/...ea8fd94c9d
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)