Why won't the prime graph correctly?

05222019, 02:16 PM
Post: #1




Why won't the prime graph correctly?
I'm trying to graph f(x) = x^0.4 * (x+3). However, it doesn't graph anything lower than x=0. Desmos graphs it correctly, but this doesn't. Any help?


05222019, 02:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 05222019 02:57 PM by Aries.)
Post: #2




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
Try y = x^(2/5)*(x+3)
Best, Aries 

05222019, 03:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 05222019 03:17 PM by ijabbott.)
Post: #3




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05222019 02:16 PM)gba456 Wrote: I'm trying to graph f(x) = x^0.4 * (x+3). However, it doesn't graph anything lower than x=0. Desmos graphs it correctly, but this doesn't. Any help? It doesn't like fractional powers of negative numbers. Try this instead: F1(X) = (5 NTHROOT X)^2 * (X+3) Or: F1(X) = (X^2)^0.2 * (X+3) — Ian Abbott 

05222019, 04:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 05222019 04:34 PM by DrD.)
Post: #4




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
In Advanced Graphing, (using upper case variables): V1: Y=X^0.4*(X+3)
[attachment=7279] 

05232019, 06:13 AM
Post: #5




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
Hello
The "problem" is that (2)^0.4 is a complex number, not a real as most people have been lead to expect by their math teachers. Prime does indeed graph the graph as mathematician would expect it. power of a non decimal number is only equivalent to a nth root when x>=0, this "equivalence" does not carry on when x<0. If you do want to calculate/draw the nth root, use the nthroot function. Cyrille Although I work for the HP calculator group, the views and opinions I post here are my own. I do not speak for HP. 

05232019, 09:14 AM
Post: #6




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?  
05232019, 03:42 PM
Post: #7




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05232019 09:14 AM)Aries Wrote: Quite the contrary, teachers know very well what they are teaching, calculators are stupid and/or badly programmedI suppose different people have different opinions. Here are what the four calculators with me at school (I teach Physics) today say:
On a calculator that can handle complex numbers, the complex result is what I would expect. If a calculator tells me that \((1)^{1/3}\) is \(1\), I don't know what result it will give me for \((1\pm{\bf i}\epsilon)^{1/3}\). The cut in the complex plane must be somewhere unusual. On a calculator that handles only real numbers, I prefer an error. The problem is that when the power is a real number  for example, \(0.4\)  a calculator that tries to give a real answer must first turn the power into a rational number, express it in its lowest terms, and then throw an error only if the denominator is even. The Casio appears to do this  \((1)^{0.4}\) gives 1, powers of 0.401 up to 0.407 give Math Error, and a power of 0.408 gives 1. It's logical, it's consistent, but is it sensible? I think that to put the Prime's behaviour down to being "badly programmed" is to miss the point. There is a conceptual difference between a fractional power and an integral nth root: whether to ignore this difference, or if not, how to address it, aren't trivial questions. I think the Prime gets it right by having two separate functions, each behaving as I'd expect. If I were a maths teacher teaching fractional powers at a basic level, I might prefer the behaviour of the Casio. I'm surprised to hear that the TI NSpire appears to follow the Casio  is there a complex mode that needs to be turned on, and if so, does this change the behaviour? Nigel (UK) 

05232019, 06:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 05232019 06:24 PM by Gilles.)
Post: #8




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05232019 03:42 PM)Nigel (UK) Wrote:(05232019 09:14 AM)Aries Wrote: Quite the contrary, teachers know very well what they are teaching, calculators are stupid and/or badly programmedI suppose different people have different opinions. Here are what the four calculators with me at school (I teach Physics) today say: WolframAlpha gives the same complex result as does the HP50g, newRPL, HPPrime (in home mode,set allow complex number). There is a bug in the NSpire here 

05232019, 06:38 PM
Post: #9




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?  
05232019, 06:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 05232019 07:01 PM by toml_12953.)
Post: #10




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05232019 03:42 PM)Nigel (UK) Wrote: HP Prime: (1)^(1/3) gives an error in Home mode (only integral powers of negative numbers allowed) and a complex result in CAS mode. On my Prime in Home mode I get 0.500000000001+0.866025403784*i I have "Allow complex output from real input" checked in settings. Tom L ...other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, what did you think of the play? 

05232019, 07:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 05232019 07:33 PM by Gilles.)
Post: #11




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05232019 06:59 PM)toml_12953 Wrote:(05232019 03:42 PM)Nigel (UK) Wrote: HP Prime: (1)^(1/3) gives an error in Home mode (only integral powers of negative numbers allowed) and a complex result in CAS mode. I think that's the correct behavior. It's old for me but my teachers always teached me that the C set is a superset of R (wich is a superset of Q, which is superset of Z, wich is superset of N). From a mathematical point of view, you can have no solution in R and one (or more) solution in C, but you cant have a principal solution in R wich is different in C : it is not consistant. It will be like to get a different result in N and in R: a nonsense. But i'm not mathematician and I'm interested of mathematicien point of view. Perhaps i'm wrong. Edit : the graph of the NSPIRE (up), are inconsistant in this point of view. 

05242019, 09:16 AM
Post: #12




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05232019 06:59 PM)toml_12953 Wrote:You are correct. I wanted to see what the Prime would do if complex output was disallowed, so I had "Allow complex output from real input" unticked. I should have made that clear. Thank you!(05232019 03:42 PM)Nigel (UK) Wrote: HP Prime: (1)^(1/3) gives an error in Home mode (only integral powers of negative numbers allowed) and a complex result in CAS mode. Nigel (UK) 

05242019, 10:04 AM
Post: #13




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05232019 06:21 PM)Gilles Wrote: WolframAlpha gives the same complex result as does the HP50g, newRPL, HPPrime (in home mode,set allow complex number). There is a bug in the NSpire here The Nspire CX CAS and Nspire CX II CAS give the complex answer if complex is turned on in settings and 1 if complex results are turned off. In real mode, 1 could be considered correct since cubing the cube root of 1 gives the original number: ((1)^(1/3))^3 = 1 (1)^(1/3) = 1 Ans^3 = 1 Tom L ...other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, what did you think of the play? 

05242019, 10:43 AM
(This post was last modified: 05242019 10:44 AM by Tim Wessman.)
Post: #14




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
So basically...
The issue with any mathematical device is when people just say "I didn't get what I thought, so therefore it is wrong" when the correct response is "Why?". TW Although I work for the HP calculator group, the views and opinions I post here are my own. 

05242019, 12:46 PM
Post: #15




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05242019 10:43 AM)Tim Wessman Wrote: So basically... But what I thought was right otherwise why would I think it? Tom L ...other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, what did you think of the play? 

05242019, 03:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 05242019 05:22 PM by ijabbott.)
Post: #16




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
I was playing around with plotting (in the Function app) the following function, which is a variant of the original function in this thread (I added the ABS()):
F1(X)=ABS(X^0.4)*(X+3) As expected, values for X>=0 are plotted always, but values for X<0 are only plotted when "Allow complex output from real input" is selected in the Home Settings. EDIT  THIS BIT IS WRONG: Then I tried to override the "Allow complex output from real input" setting in the Symbolic Setup, but changing the "Complex" setting from "System" to "Off" or "On" didn't seem to have any effect on the values plotted  it still only depended on the setting in Home Settings. Any idea why that should be the case? After repeating the above test, the "Complex" setting in "Symbolic Setup" does have an effect, although the On/Off setting is inverted (see below). I'm not sure what I was doing wrong the first time (I have installed a connectivity kit since then). There are some other oddities about configuring the Complex setting in the Symbolic Setup. First of all, the setting here seems to be inverted. Setting it to "On" disables complex output from real inputs in the calculator. Setting it to "Off" enables complex output from real inputs in the calculator. Secondly, setting Complex to "Off" or "On" in the Symbolic Setup hides the complex display format setting in Home Settings. You just get a string that says "See Symbolic Setup", but the complex display format is not configurable in the Symbolic Setup. (Note: I was using the HP Prime virtual calculator version from 20181016 for the above tests.) — Ian Abbott 

05242019, 04:06 PM
Post: #17




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05242019 03:36 PM)ijabbott Wrote: There are some other oddities about configuring the Complex setting in the Symbolic Setup. First of all, the setting here seems to be inverted. Setting it to "On" disables complex output from real inputs in the calculator. Setting it to "Off" enables complex output from real inputs in the calculator. Secondly, setting Complex to "Off" or "On" in the Symbolic Setup hides the complex display format setting in Home Settings. You just get a string that says "See Symbolic Setup", but the complex display format is not configurable in the Symbolic Setup. Thanks a lot! Your post gave me a headache just trying to follow the settings! Tom L ...other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, what did you think of the play? 

05242019, 04:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 05242019 05:27 PM by ijabbott.)
Post: #18




RE: Why won't the prime graph correctly?
(05242019 04:06 PM)toml_12953 Wrote:(05242019 03:36 PM)ijabbott Wrote: There are some other oddities about configuring the Complex setting in the Symbolic Setup. First of all, the setting here seems to be inverted. Setting it to "On" disables complex output from real inputs in the calculator. Setting it to "Off" enables complex output from real inputs in the calculator. Secondly, setting Complex to "Off" or "On" in the Symbolic Setup hides the complex display format setting in Home Settings. You just get a string that says "See Symbolic Setup", but the complex display format is not configurable in the Symbolic Setup. Actually, I made a mistake in the bit before that paragraph, and have edited the post to correct it. To illustrate: go to Symbolic Setup (Shift  Symb) and set Complex to On. Then press the Home key and try and take the square root of 1. (Fail!) Now go back to Symbolic Setup and set Complex to Off. Now try and take the square root of 1 again. (Success!) — Ian Abbott 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)